Retired MLB star Jose Canseco lost a finger (again) throughout a poker competition week that is last.
Jose Canseco was the central figure in a weekend for the poker world that has been filled with fingers: some missing, some pointed at prominent names into the poker community. In Canseco’s case, he seemingly have lost the finger that is same the 2nd time in of a month, a thing that few individuals (with any luck) will ever get to experience.
In late October, Canseco ended up being in the news headlines for unintentionally shooting himself in the hand. According to Canseco, the incident happened while he was cleansing their gun in their kitchen. He finished up shooting their finger, which then needed to be surgically reattached. It seems some surgeons are more skilled than other people at digital fixes, though.
Finger Comes Off During Poker Tournament
According to a tweet sent down by Canseco on Friday, nevertheless, the little finger became detached again while he was playing in a poker tournament Thursday evening.
‘ I was playing in a poker competition night that is last my finger dropped of,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘Someone took a video clip of it.’
Fortunately, Canseco didn’t post that video, however there clearly was at least one supposed image of his finger before it fell off. As gruesome because the incident may however sound, Canseco said that this result might have been inevitable from the time he shot himself.
‘My little finger needs to have been amputated from the beginning,’ Canseco tweeted. ‘It was really loose with no bone in order to connect it. It had been additionally smelling actually bad.’
There had been no word on whether or not Canseco won the hand to make up for losing the hand. Previously, Canseco’s fingers were best-known for gripping bats during his 17-year league that is major being a professional baseball player, during which he hit 462 house runs.
Colman Offers Hellmuth the Verbal Finger
Meanwhile, One Drop winner Daniel Colman was pointing a finger, still firmly connected, of his own at 13-time World Series of Poker bracelet champion Phil Hellmuth. Colman made some comments that are harsh Hellmuth in a thread concerning the latter’s present appearance on a podcast hosted by Rounders journalist Brian Koppelman.
‘Its embarrassing that we have to share whores like this guy to our profession,’ Colman wrote. ‘After we win one drop, he immediately comes on stage to shake my hand in front of a camera and congratulate me personally. Just as if he’s the gatekeeper to the poker world and welcoming me in.
‘It is truly pathetic that the 40 year old would behave the way he does at the table, not forgetting how spineless he is, simply willing to take any sponsorship regardless of the organization’s integrity,’ the $22 million winner waxed on. ‘ Really makes me sad to think there’s a chance some social people may look as much as this charlatan. People of his mindset and character are really a cancer to this globe.’
Hellmuth was evidently hurt and surprised by the feedback, and responded shortly to them on Twitter.
‘Ouch, I was just assaulted big time on a terrific poker forum,’ Hellmuth tweeted. ‘It was personal and it hurts, but I am proud of this man I am!’
For their component, Colman later admitted that his choice of language was too harsh, and made a decision to back the tone off of his post, also if he stood behind the message.
‘I acknowledge to being too harsh in my initial post. Phil didn’t deserve that hateful of the message,’ Colman later wrote. ‘That being said, I still stand by the gist that is main of post. Phil’s behavior in poker is atrocious, and I do not think it belongs in this game.’
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Pushing for Legal US Sports Betting
NBA Commissioner Adam Silver claims that US sports that are legal should be regulated in the United States. (Image: USATSI)
Can appropriate US recreations betting, across the board, be a thing ever? a proponent that is surprising emerged in the proper execution of NBA Commissioner Adam Silver.
Commissioner Silver penned an op-ed for The ny Times recently, stating that he believes it’s time to allow sports betting to take place lawfully through the United States. That stance is in opposition to that of all major recreations organizations in the USA, including the previously held position by the NBA and its commissioner that is former Stern.
‘Betting on professional recreations is unlawful in a lot of the United States outside of Nevada,’ Silver said from the beginning of their opinion piece. ‘we think we require a unique approach.’
Currently Illegal generally in most States
Silver went on to outline the state that is current of betting in america.
In 1992, Congress passed the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), a piece of legislation that prohibited states from regulating sports betting, while grandfathering in four states that already had some kind of the betting available. Nevada could be the only state with complete sports betting, while Delaware, Montana and Oregon also have the proper to offer more limited types of sports-based gambling.
The NBA, along with other sports leagues and organizations in the US, has previously stood in opposition to legalizing sports betting for decades as silver states. But that hasn’t stopped individuals from gambling on the games, whatever the lack of the appropriate, regulated option.
‘But despite legal restrictions, sports wagering is extensive,’ Silver wrote. ‘It is a thriving underground business that operates free of regulation or oversight. Because there are few legal options available, those who would like to bet resort to bookmaking that is illicit and shady offshore internet sites.’
In accordance with Silver, some estimates put the volume of illegal sports gambling in the united states of america at the maximum amount of as $400 billion per year. That dwarfs the total amount of appropriate sports betting that takes place in nevada gambling enterprises and other locations in Nevada.
Trends Aim Towards Regulation
Within the piece, Silver writes in regards to the ‘domestic and trends that are global towards regulation of recreations betting. He points out that many states now offer at least some type of legal gambling, and that online gambling has already been managed in three states. Because of this, he says, it’s the perfect time for Congress to enact new regulations to replace PASPA.
‘Congress should adopt a framework that is federal allows states to authorize betting on professional sports, subject to strict regulatory needs and technological safeguards,’ he wrote.
Silver has previously made remarks suggesting he would be thinking about seeing regulated sports betting in the us, though here is the first time he has organized his position in full. Other sports leagues declined to discuss Silver’s stance.
Cuban Backs Silver’s Stance
Nevertheless, a minumum of one NBA owner has already sided with the commissioner. Outspoken Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban told CBSsports.com that ‘Adam has it exactly appropriate.’
‘In the past for PR reasons, we have set up token resistance to them,’ Cuban said. ‘I trust Adam that now could be the time to take sports betting out from the shadows and deal along with it just like the huge business it is.’
Despite Silver’s remarks, however, New Jersey should not expect the NBA to pull out of a lawsuit that is aiming to stop the continuing state from allowing activities betting to go on at its gambling enterprises and racetracks.
‘Without a comprehensive solution that is federal state measures such as New Jersey’s recent effort will be both unlawful and bad general public policy,’ Silver penned.
Ron Paul Rails Against Adelson Internet Poker Ban slotsforfun-ca.com Plan
Ron Paul laid out their arguments against an online gambling ban that happens to be highly supported by casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. (Image: David J. Phillip /AP)
Ron Paul has used their column that is weekly for Ron Paul Institute to argue against an Internet gambling ban, saying that such legislation would curtail the freedom of Americans and is taken up only for the benefit of casino owner Sheldon Adelson.
The former Republican Representative from Texas called such legislation an example of ‘cronyism,’ something he claims that many Americans are against aside from their political ideologies.
‘For example, Congress may soon vote on legislation Internet that is outlawing gambling’ Paul composed.
‘It is a secret that is open at least inside the Beltway, that this legislation is being thought to be a favor to billionaire casino owner, Sheldon Adelson. Mr. Adelson, who is perhaps most commonly known for making use of his enormous wealth to advance a pro-war international policy, is now using his governmental influence to turn his online competitors into criminals.’
Gambling Ban Introduced to Congress in March
Paul’s words make reference to the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA), a bill that ended up being introduced by Republicans both in homely homes of Congress in March, and has now since picked up little but notable levels of bipartisan help in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill would outlaw many forms of on line gambling at the level that is federal essentially changing the wording of the Wire Act to explicitly ban casino games and poker rather than just activities betting, as it happens to be interpreted.
Paul spent much of his column dissecting and rejecting the reasons that are various for supporting the ban in an effort to show that it was really only being considered in the interests of Adelson.
‘Supporters of an Internet gambling ban publicly deny they are motivated with a desire to curry favor with a wealthy donor,’ Paul wrote. ‘ Instead, they give a wide range of high-minded reasons for wanting to ban this activity. Some claim that legalizing online gambling will enrich criminals as well as terrorists! But criminalizing casinos that are online not eliminate the demand for online casinos. Rather, passage of this legislation will guarantee that the likely online gambling marketplace is managed by criminals.’
Paul Criticizes States’ Rights Argument
Certainly one of the( that is major to numerous, perplexing) arguments used by supporters of RAWA is that such a ban would really protect states’ rights. Paul explained their argument before laying down his thinking for why it was faulty.
‘Their argument is that citizens of states that ban Internet gambling may easily get around those laws by accessing online casinos operating in states where online gambling is legalized,’ Paul reported. ‘ Whether or not the argument had merit that permitting states to legalize online gambling undermines laws in other states, it wouldn’t normally justify legislation that is federal the issue…arguing that ‘states liberties’ justifies creating new federal crimes turns the Tenth Amendment, which ended up being intended to limit federal energy, on its head.’
Paul organized several more arguments against the legislation before summarizing their opposition to a gambling ban that is online.
‘The proposed ban on Internet gambling is a blatantly unconstitutional infringement on our liberties which will likely expand the surveillance state,’ he concluded. ‘Worst of most, it is all being done for the benefit of one effective billionaire.’
RAWA is unlikely to get a hearing or see much movement in Congress through the current lame duck session. However, its prospects could improve into the next Congress, whenever Republicans will have majorities in both your house and Senate.